The function of Transaction ID (TID) in programmatic promoting has turn out to be some of the contentious subjects in latest weeks, as patrons, sellers and expertise intermediaries debate its implications for transparency, management and income.
The newest flashpoint bubbled to the floor final week when Prebid quietly issued a change that rendered TID non-unique throughout exchanges, successfully undermining its main function of serving to patrons detect duplicate bid requests. The change was initially rolled out with little public discover, however issues about governance and affect in open-source requirements had been quickly raised.
On August 27, Ari Paparo, CEO of Marketecture Media, flagged the difficulty on X, drawing broader consideration to the event, which sparked an impassioned debate quickly after.
Why it issues
TID, a part of the Prebid and OpenRTB requirements, is a novel identifier that may tie a number of bid requests for a similar impression again to a single public sale. For patrons, notably demand-side platforms equivalent to The Commerce Desk, it’s a software to chop by means of the noise of extreme request duplication and route spend extra effectively towards high-quality publishers.
Nevertheless, for publishers and a few supply-side platforms, broad adoption introduces threat: exposing duplication might depress yields, shift leverage towards patrons, and diminish already restricted management over public sale dynamics.
The implications prolong past particular person income strains. For advertisers, cleaner auctions promise effectivity and diminished waste. For publishers, nevertheless, there may be worry that transparency will speed up commoditization and tilt energy additional towards dominant DSPs. The Prebid adjustment deepened this unease, eradicating the power for publishers to decide on whether or not or to not implement TID and forcing the controversy right into a governance disaster over open-source technical requirements.
Writer pushback
A lot of the latest debate has unfolded publicly on each LinkedIn and X, with some of the distinguished responses from Paul Bannister of Raptive, who warned that TID might erode publishers’ final line of knowledge management.
In his instance, a writer working three exchanges might designate a deal ID with a $20 ground in a single, however permit open-market pricing within the others. With TID, a DSP might merely ignore the deal ID public sale and bid on the cheaper alternate options, successfully bypassing writer intent. Bannister concluded, “Publishers have given up mainly all knowledge management at this level, and this may be the ultimate nail within the coffin.”
This attitude resonated extensively, highlighting writer skepticism that TID, whereas positioned as a transparency software, may additionally facilitate buy-side exploitation of knowledge alerts and weaken deal-based monetization.
On-line discourse
Moreover, final week, the August 29 version of the Marketecture Podcast featured a debate between Jounce Media’s Chris Kane and The Commerce Desk’s Mike O’Sullivan, additional crystallizing opposing viewpoints on the deserves of TID.
- Chris Kane, Jounce Media: Publishers fear that exposing duplication will scale back income and provides DSPs higher leverage, whereas additionally elevating issues about buy-side dominance and potential knowledge leakage.
- Mike O’Sullivan, Sincera, by The Commerce Desk: TID reduces wasteful public sale duplication, rewards higher-quality publishers, and helps maintain the open internet aggressive with walled gardens by creating cleaner, extra environment friendly auctions.
Prebid vs. Tech Lab?
Including weight to the dialogue, Anthony Katsur, CEO of the IAB Tech Lab, weighed in on LinkedIn, stating that Prebid’s change violates OpenRTB consistency and dangers fragmenting requirements. He urged {industry} stakeholders to interact in a proper course of to make sure transparency with out destabilizing the ecosystem.
In the meantime, Gareth Glaser used his extensively learn Substack, Gareth Hates Advert Tech, to bluntly ask, “Why can’t all of us simply get alongside?” His commentary displays the widespread weariness with recurring transparency debates in advert tech, suggesting that whereas TID might seem technical, its actual affect lies in entrenched distrust between patrons and sellers.
The Transaction ID debate illustrates how technical debates are, in actuality, usually ciphers for an influence battle in programmatic promoting. For patrons, TID represents a possibility to streamline spend and reward transparency. For publishers, it’s seen as yet one more mechanism for patrons to say management and erode margins.
With Prebid’s determination undermining TID’s effectiveness and {industry} leaders just like the IAB Tech Lab calling for readability, the difficulty now stands at a crossroads. Whether or not the ecosystem can coalesce round a typical that balances transparency with writer autonomy stays unresolved.
However because the depth of the net discourse reveals, the implications for effectivity, equity and belief throughout digital promoting are something however trivial.
Numbers to know
What we’ve coated
Amazon reverses its Google Purchasing retreat, making life tougher for efficiency patrons
Amazon abruptly paused almost all world Google Purchasing spend for 31 days, sparking hypothesis about its motives. It has since resumed, compressing opponents’ share and sure driving CPCs greater, leaving efficiency entrepreneurs with fewer alternatives.
Way forward for TV Briefing: The 2025 glossary
The “Way forward for TV Briefing: 2025 glossary” is a dwelling dictionary of evolving phrases throughout streaming, CTV, and video promoting. For media and promoting professionals, it’s invaluable shorthand: clarifying jargon, monitoring rising ideas, and guaranteeing {industry} conversations and consumer methods keep exact, present, and aggressive.
What we’ve heard
“Connor has been the CSO for ages… Undecided if it’s something. That is simply PR for the sake of PR… I suppose it’s summer time…”
—Seems, Conor McCogney has been the chief technique officer of Criteo a while earlier than the August 26 press launch was printed.
What we’re studying
How Google is making ready to make advert tech unit impartial
The Data’s Catherine Perloff reviews on maneuvers that would arguably proceed the largest potential improvement in advert tech.
The Commerce Desk’s AI platform sparks issues over biased stock
Advert Age’s Garett Sloane notes that Kokai is elevating alarms amongst supply-side companions who fear their offers are being deprioritized.
Is Google about to destroy the open internet?
The BBC notes that extra existential fears are being prompted by Large Tech and its open-armed adoption of AI.
The Commerce Desk Q2 2025 earnings: strong, however a 37% inventory worth drop
W Media Analysis’s Karsten Weide performs a deep dive into the DSP’s challenges and alternatives forward.
