AMANDA KERSEY: Welcome to HBR On Management, case research and conversations with the world’s prime enterprise and administration specialists—hand-selected that can assist you unlock the perfect in these round you.
I’m HBR senior editor and producer Amanda Kersey.
One of many easiest methods to strengthen your management is to ask higher questions. They’ll open up info you’d in any other case miss, construct belief, and even make you extra persuasive. However most of us don’t ask sufficient; and after we do, we don’t all the time ask them in the simplest manner.
On this IdeaCast episode from 2018, host Sarah Inexperienced Carmichael talks with Harvard Enterprise Faculty professors Leslie John and Alison Wooden Brooks. Their analysis reveals how considerate questions—whether or not open-ended, pointed, or follow-ups—can change the way you’re seen as a pacesetter and colleague.
Right here’s Sarah.
SARAH GREEN CARMICHAEL: Leslie, thanks a lot for becoming a member of us at the moment.
LESLIE Ok. JOHN: Thanks for having me.
SARAH GREEN CARMICHAEL: And Alison, thanks for coming again.
ALISON WOOD BROOKS: I’m so completely satisfied to be again.
SARAH GREEN CARMICHAEL: So, let’s simply begin by speaking about what’s the profit to asking good questions in enterprise.
ALISON WOOD BROOKS: Truly, the higher query may be, what’s the advantage of asking questions in enterprise? As a result of the advantages are so considerable. Um, let me begin just by saying that most individuals don’t ask sufficient questions they usually’re lacking out on many, many advantages, together with that asking questions opens up the door for the alternate of knowledge. Once I ask you questions, I’m going to, you’re going to reply almost definitely and I’m going to study what’s in your thoughts. In order that’s info alternate, it’s very invaluable. Along with info alternate, we all know that asking questions will increase interpersonal liking as a result of I’m exhibiting that I’m curious about studying and what’s in your thoughts, I appear very attentive to you and empathic and I’m taking your perspective, and I care about you. And that’s likable. Uh, we additionally know that asking questions will increase persuasion, uh, once more, as a result of I’m taking your perspective, as a substitute of attempting to promote, promote, promote, I’m studying what you want after which I can ship that to you.
SARAH GREEN CARMICHAEL: Plenty of advantages.
LESLIE Ok. JOHN: However one of many I feel actually fascinating insights of Alison’s analysis on this matter is that folks don’t recognize this. So, it’s not apparent to us, we don’t, we don’t—we actually underestimate the worth and the facility of questions.
ALISON WOOD BROOKS: Yeah. Even individuals in conversations are conscious of what number of questions they’ve requested and what number of questions different individuals have requested, however they don’t intuit the hyperlink between query asking, and liking, persuasion, and data alternate. It’s simply not apparent, which is a part of the explanation that we in all probability don’t ask sufficient questions. We don’t perceive the considerable advantages that await us.
SARAH GREEN CARMICHAEL: It does shock me to listen to you say that folks don’t by some means perceive the hyperlink between asking questions and turning into extra likable as a result of that’s like among the relationship recommendation that you’ll all the time get proper, is, ask a lot of questions. I did this after I had unsuccessful on-line relationship, um, a few years in the past. I might be like, I’m going to make it some extent of asking a lot of questions as a result of I feel, , that’s how I’m going to get date quantity two. No! No dates quantity two. It actually… I don’t know what I used to be doing improper—one thing!
LESLIE Ok. JOHN: I feel there’s, um, like probably an attention-grabbing irony right here in that if you really need one thing, like, for instance, a relationship context, when you go into a primary date, and also you’re actually drawn to the individual, I feel instinctively we form of go into this “promote mode,” this mode of, like, we have to inform them stuff about ourselves to make them like us. However I feel that in some ways, and the analysis factors to this, that that is form of a flawed psychological mannequin. The place, really, if we get them speaking, they’re going to love us extra due to the purpose of Alison, one among her findings, that folks simply don’t notice that we predict we’re form of possibly too self-focused in all of this.
SARAH GREEN CARMICHAEL: So, what are among the questions you guys have discovered which might be actually efficient?
LESLIE Ok. JOHN: So, in conditions the place somebody could also be tempted to deceive you, when you ask a query that presupposes the factor that they don’t wish to let you know to be true, that’s a more practical technique to getting them to let you know the reality than a query that does the other. So, an instance could be, think about your, that is actually easy, think about you’re speaking to a provider and also you’re questioning whether or not the provider goes to ship on time. Um, so the delicate piece of knowledge that the provider could also be reticent to disclose is that no, we’re not going to be on time. So, you possibly can ask them, you possibly can say you’re going to be on time, proper? That’s form of an optimistic assumption, or you possibly can say, I’m guessing you may be form of late, proper? And that might be a pessimistic assumption. So, it’s simpler for the provider to inform the reality if you ask it in a pessimistic manner as a result of they only must form of affirm one thing. Whereas when you ask them within the optimistic manner, it’s more durable for the provider to confess to that factor. Um, in order that they must contradict you. They’d must be like, really, we’re going to jot down. The essential level is that you simply wish to make it straightforward for the opposite social gathering in these aggressive conditions. You wish to make it straightforward for them to let you know the factor that’s laborious for them to let you know. And so, you possibly can take into consideration the way you construction your questions in a manner in order that it helps them to reveal basically.
SARAH GREEN CARMICHAEL: What a few kind of variations between open-ended questions versus closed questions as a result of normally in my job as an interviewer, I attempt to ask a lot of open-ended questions, however are there conditions the place these usually are not as efficient as a kind of tighter, closed query?
ALISON WOOD BROOKS: Yeah, so it is determined by your objectives. And I feel when you’re interviewing someone otherwise you’re attempting to brainstorm or work out what their pursuits are, asking open-ended questions, the way in which they reply these questions will probably be indicative of what’s on their minds, proper? You’re giving them an extended leash to determine like, how am I going to reply this? Now, when you shift to a extra aggressive dialog the place individuals will probably be guarded concerning the info they’ve, then pointed questions could be very efficient at attempting to suss out the reality. It’s, it’s very laborious to lie explicitly to somebody’s face after I say, okay, you’re promoting me this used iPod hasn’t been broken previously. It’s a lot more durable to say no. Proper, proper to my face with a sure, no query. Then if I say, inform me concerning the historical past of this iPod. Then you possibly can lie by omission fairly simply. Um, one other kind of query that I wish to make the case for that’s so magical and highly effective because the follow-up query. So right here we’re speaking about very particular examples and situations the place sure sorts of questions will probably be good. Comply with up questions are nearly all the time good. Okay. They present that you simply’re listening to what the individual has already mentioned. You’re probing for extra info, which reveals that you simply listened, you care, and also you wish to know extra, which is like the entire embodiment of empathy and perspective taking. So, you appear to be a really caring individual and also you’re sensible since you’re going to study extra info. It’s like the entire good issues wrapped up into one question-asking technique.
SARAH GREEN CARMICHAEL: I feel we’re now realizing why I didn’t get any second dates. I feel I used to be not asking follow-up questions, I used to be merely asking like a random checklist of questions. Okay. So, why is the follow-up query—I’ll attempt to ask a follow-up query about follow-up questions. Why are follow-up questions a lot extra highly effective than different kinds of questions?
ALISON WOOD BROOKS: So, the questions that aren’t follow-up questions, we’d classify: they’re both an introductory query, so like, hello, how are you? Or rhetorical questions that don’t even actually demand a response. However more often than not questions which might be comply with up questions are topic-switching questions. So, I would say issues like, the place are you from? Pay attention, hear, hear, hear. Do you just like the band U2? Pay attention, hear, hear, hear. So, it feels such as you’re working your manner down the checklist of subjects, which is okay, however it might be rather more partaking and attention-grabbing to say, the place are you from? Oh, I’ve been to Tuscaloosa. Do you reside on this neighborhood? I had a good friend who was from there have been, , the place did you develop up? What have been your mother and father like? What did your home seem like? What do you remorse about rising up there? All types of follow-up questions that make it actually partaking. Nearly all of our, um, results of query asking are defined by the facility of follow-up questions.
SARAH GREEN CARMICHAEL: It seems like a whole lot of this recommendation is kind of context dependent. So, when you have an adversarial relationship the place you suppose that the individual may deceive you, you should take a special strategy. What when you’re not precisely positive the place you stand with somebody that possibly you’re employed collectively, however not all the time very nicely and also you’re unsure if this individual is a good friend or an enemy or like a frenemy.
ALISON WOOD BROOKS: You sound such as you’re speaking from expertise, Sarah, they usually’re going to get nervous.
SARAH GREEN CARMICHAEL: I feel we’ve all had relationships, particularly at work, the place we’re not precisely positive the place we stand.
ALISON WOOD BROOKS: No, I feel we’ve nearly constructed this false dichotomy the place we presume that everybody is aware of you’re in a cooperative dialog or a aggressive one—
LESLIE Ok. JOHN: And that every is one or the opposite.
ALISON WOOD BROOKS: Proper? And in reality, most conversations are combined objectives. You will have a cooperative purpose to have enjoyable and revel in your interactions with others. Often, there’s some kind of battle purpose even amongst managers and their direct stories. If you must give suggestions, constructive suggestions, when you if you must consider efficiency, if you must negotiate a wage. And oftentimes you don’t actually know what’s the mixture of cooperative and aggressive objectives on this interplay that we’re in proper now. So, your query is an efficient one. How will we navigate this? Um, I’ll argue that in nearly each state of affairs, whether or not it’s cooperative or aggressive, asking questions doesn’t harm. It hurts so much lower than individuals suppose. So, we’re very reticent to ask questions as a result of we’re afraid that we’re going to ask one thing that’s impolite or incompetent or inappropriate and, in our outcomes, and our findings, we discover that there are only a few questions that folks understand as impolite, incompetent or inappropriate, um, and so, after which particularly follow-up questions. So simply begin someplace, hearken to their reply, after which comply with up. And that can work in nearly any scenario.
SARAH GREEN CARMICHAEL: When is it higher to ask the powerful query first? Resist kind of warming somebody as much as it after which constructing up to date if you ask what you actually wish to ask them.
LESLIE Ok. JOHN: Yeah. So, there’s one among my favourite, uh, items of analysis is, um, this Arthur Aron’s work, it’s a basic on how he and his coauthors introduced individuals into the lab, they usually bought individuals to ask questions to one another. They usually instructed the dyad—in order that they, they put individuals into little teams of two, they didn’t know one another earlier than the examine—they usually bought every group of two to ask one another questions they usually began with form of the most secure questions, the much less disclosing questions first, after which they progressively bought into form of deeper and deeper questions like what’s your greatest remorse in life? And actually form of hefty stuff. And um, they, they discovered that relative to manage conditions that getting individuals to ask questions to one another and to share on this manner of like elevated revelation produced liking amongst these dyads. However then as a counterpoint, we’ve got some analysis the place we requested individuals questions. Now these have been several types of questions. These have been very direct questions. Um, and we systematically diversified the order during which we requested individuals the questions. So, some individuals began with form of the simplest questions first they usually bought progressively more durable. Different individuals, we began with the toughest questions first they usually bought progressively simpler. After which we had one other model the place individuals have been simply requested in form of a random order. And in distinction to what Aron discovered, we really discovered that folks disclosed extra. Um, if you began with probably the most delicate questions. My conclusion or one conclusion is that you simply kind of heat up and begin with the straightforward questions and then you definately progressively construct rapport. However we discovered that the other can result in extra revelation. And so, you consider, nicely, how do you, how do you sq. away these two completely different findings? And a technique that we’ve got been fascinated by it comes all the way down to this purpose of the interplay. So, when you’re in a, if the purpose is to foster a relationship and if it’s a really cooperative setting, then beginning with easing your manner into issues I feel is conducive to engaging in that purpose. But when alternatively, the purpose is a aggressive scenario the place the purpose is info elicitation, then beginning with probably the most delicate questions can elevated disclosure total. It’s once more although not with out its dangers, like if the primary query you ask is extraordinarily delicate, you threat actually offending the individual and having them stroll away from you. So not with out its dangers however—
SARAH GREEN CARMICHAEL: And there’s so much occurring with tone too, proper? Discuss to us a little bit bit about kind of learn how to ask these questions, not simply what you ask.
LESLIE Ok. JOHN: Effectively, we’ve discovered that particularly if you’re asking for delicate query are form of inclination may be that we must always undertake a really somber tone and we must always actually reiterate to the individual that all the things’s confidential, don’t fear, it’s going to be okay, no matter you say. However what we discovered is that typically the extra assurances we give to individuals, the extra worrisome it’s for that individual to reveal. And so, what we discover is that when you’re a little bit extra informal about it and nonchalant about the way in which you ask questions, that may make the opposite social gathering extra comfy responding. I’m responding to your questions.
SARAH GREEN CARMICHAEL: What are among the methods during which the dynamics are completely different if you’re in a gaggle versus if you’re simply interviewing or speaking with somebody one-on-one.
ALISON WOOD BROOKS: Conversational dynamics modified profoundly when the group will get bigger and query asking dynamics change specifically. Um, it is determined by the composition of the group. Are there males, ladies? What are their ages? Who’s the chief? What are their standing relationships? There are norms round all of this stuff about who needs to be asking questions, who’s anticipated to ask questions and who’s anticipated to reply them. And anytime you could break these norms—so when you’re anticipated to reply questions, why not strive asking one as a substitute? Anytime you possibly can break these norms, I feel it retains issues partaking and attention-grabbing.
LESLIE Ok. JOHN: It additionally introduces a number of issues, potential issues. In the event you consider an essential purpose of asking and answering questions is, after all, info sharing. And after I consider, um, group contexts, you may have new dangers together with the loudest voices are those which might be heard. Or the individuals, put in a different way, the individuals which might be most comfy talking up in teams are those that say issues. However your consolation in talking up in teams is unrelated to the—oftentimes I might enterprise to say—is unrelated as to if you may have good issues to say. And so, when you’re attempting to get various views, um, clever issues mentioned it may be a fear in group contexts, is that sort of some dominating personalities find yourself doing all of the speaking. They usually could have good issues to say, however it might even be to the neglect of listening to from individuals who even have good and various further factors to contribute.
ALISON WOOD BROOKS: One factor we see with our college students so much—and I feel this occurs in a whole lot of work contexts as nicely, and Leslie and I are each younger ladies college members—um, that sure members of the group, and this occurs with ladies and I feel simply younger individuals broadly, or possibly low-status individuals, really feel like they should have one thing actually nice to say, like they should have an excellent assertion to make with the intention to communicate up and say one thing in a gaggle context. Seems that it’s actually, actually helpful to simply be the one who asks questions that may open a brand new essential matter space or information the dialog in a helpful manner.
SARAH GREEN CARMICHAEL: So, if you’re placed on the spot by somebody’s query, um, what’s a form of a great way to organize for that? As a result of on the one hand, we’re giving recommendation to managers to assist them ask extra inquiries to get extra info and be extra likable. That sounds nice. But when managers hearken to this and return to their places of work in are out of the blue like asking one million questions, what ought to their groups find out about form of this new speaking with them?
ALISON WOOD BROOKS: They’re going to love them higher, so possibly it doesn’t matter! No, I take into consideration this so much. In any scenario, there are questions that you simply hope nobody asks you as a result of it would make you are feeling actually nervous and actually uncomfortable on the spot. A lot of these questions could be anticipated. Nearly all the time they are often anticipated. You simply must ask your self like, what are the issues somebody might ask me that can hold me up at evening, that can make me really feel terrible and write them down. Proper? So, when you have an essential presentation and essential assembly and there are questions that you simply’re afraid somebody will ask, don’t run away from that. Confront it, write them down, write down pithy, succinct responses to them. Observe saying the solutions out loud or observe your dodges out loud. For any query that you possibly can probably get, there’s a technique to reply it and there’s a technique to dodge it. So simply not being shocked and caught off guard is a big assist in these moments.
LESLIE Ok. JOHN: I completely agree. Preparation is so essential. And, and in addition the act of preparation, the self-reflection, I feel you possibly can study so much about your self and concerning the scenario simply by doing that, that preparation. For what it’s price, my favourite go-to of after I gasp, haven’t ready or don’t know what I’m going to say, and I’m requested a query and I don’t know what to say, my favourite line of protection is deflection by query. Asking, nicely why do you ask?
ALISON WOOD BROOKS: What do you suppose?
LESLIE Ok. JOHN: Yeah. What do you suppose? Or at school does everyone suppose this? You already know, deflection by query I feel is… every time, every time I’m in a bind in that, in that, , being requested a query that I don’t know learn how to reply. It’s a very good form of back-pocket, go-to technique.
ALISON WOOD BROOKS: I’ll say two extra fast methods. One is when you can observe your humor expertise, jokes are actually, very easy technique to dodge issues as a result of persons are so distracted laughing that they neglect what query was requested them that you simply didn’t reply it. Uh, and the second factor is used sparingly, it’s okay to be trustworthy that you simply don’t know a solution. Um, and I feel a whole lot of professors really neglect this and managers as nicely. Um, it’s okay to disclose that you simply’re not superhuman and have all of the solutions on the planet, so used sparingly, it may possibly really be very, um, humble, an incredible humility technique to say like, wow, that’s an incredible query. I really hadn’t considered that earlier than. Let me return to my staff. Let me return to my workplace and mirror about it and I’ll get again to you later at the moment.
LESLIE Ok. JOHN: One factor to not do is form of explicitly decide out of answering. So, on a survey that might be, , checking the, “I select to not reply” field. However in a dialog, if somebody asks you a pointed query, you don’t reply it’s, is saying I don’t wish to reply that or in a roundabout way conspicuously not answering the query. So, we’ve discovered that that technique is definitely worse than saying one thing actually unflattering about your self. Um, so it’s really higher when you’re confronted with a query the place when you reply it honestly, it’d reveal some unglamorous reality about your self, we discover that when you simply come clear and reply it, you’ll come off higher. Folks will such as you extra. They’ll suppose you extra reliable relative to when you fully decide out of answering, when you conspicuously abstain from answering.
SARAH GREEN CARMICHAEL: So, when you’re in a job interview and somebody’s like, nicely I see you left your final job after solely working there a month, what’s occurring?
ALISON WOOD BROOKS: I don’t wish to speak about it.
SARAH GREEN CARMICHAEL: Proper. That’s like an enormous waving pink flag. So simply provide you with one thing to say in that second is what you’re saying.
ALISON WOOD BROOKS: Yeah.
SARAH GREEN CARMICHAEL: Effectively, is there something that we actually ought to have coated that we haven’t coated?
ALISON WOOD BROOKS: That’s an incredible query. That’s a very good query.
SARAH GREEN CARMICHAEL: A really open-ended one.
ALISON WOOD BROOKS: Sure.
LESLIE Ok. JOHN: Um, I feel one factor that’s been beneath the floor of this complete dialog is the significance of listening. Listening allows you—being a very good listener lets you each ask questions successfully and reply questions successfully. And one of many methods I used to be considering of that taking part in out is if you requested what occurs when you ask a query that you simply don’t wish to know the reply to or that you simply don’t care to know the reply to, a threat of that’s you’re going to close your self off and possibly not hear. After which when you don’t hear, you’re not opening your self as much as studying extra and in flip, asking higher questions and answering questions extra successfully.
SARAH GREEN CARMICHAEL: Effectively, thanks each once more for coming in. This was actually enjoyable.
ALISON WOOD BROOKS: Thanks a lot for having us.
LESLIE Ok. JOHN: Thanks for having us.
AMANDA KERSEY: That was Harvard Enterprise Faculty professors Leslie John and Alison Wooden Brooks talking with IdeaCast host Sarah Inexperienced Carmichael. You could find their HBR article, “The Stunning Energy of Questions,” at HBR.org.
HBR On Management will probably be again subsequent Wednesday with one other hand-picked dialog from Harvard Enterprise Evaluation. If this episode helped you, share it with your pals and colleagues, and comply with the present on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you hearken to podcasts. Whilst you’re there, think about leaving us a evaluation.
If you’re prepared for extra podcasts, articles, case research, books, and movies with the world’s prime enterprise and administration specialists, discover all of it at HBR.org.
This episode was produced by Curt Nickisch and me, Amanda Kersey. On Management’s staff contains Maureen Hoch, Rob Eckhardt, Erica Truxler, Ramsey Khabbaz, Nicole Smith, and Anne Bartholomew.
Music by Coma Media. Thanks for listening.
