Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their very own.
Oftentimes, two co-founders suppose it’s a good suggestion to share CEO obligations as co-CEOs. The logic is that they will separate their roles and obligations, with one particular person main sure departments (e.g., gross sales and advertising and marketing) and the opposite particular person main different departments (e.g., know-how and operations). The truth is, it is a fairly dangerous thought.
The enterprise ought to solely have one chief at a time who can “lead the ship” and ensure the whole lot is completely coordinated throughout the complete firm. This text will train you the potential pitfalls of a co-CEO technique.
Associated: 6 Methods to Efficiently Run Your Firm With a Co-President
Lack of a sole imaginative and prescient/management
Anytime you add extra individuals to a decision-making course of, that’s most definitely going to contain you making some type of compromise, the place you aren’t doing precisely what you’ll have carried out in case you have been a stand-alone CEO.
On minor factors, it most likely would not matter. But when it will be important strategic-level factors you might be compromising, you find yourself diluting your personal private instincts and convictions. And it’s those self same instincts and convictions which might be usually the distinction between good outcomes and common outcomes. You by no means need to be ready of “managing in direction of the glad middle-ground.”
Lack of 1 sole voice throughout the staff
When there are two leaders, and people persons are not essentially in 100% alignment on the imaginative and prescient, they could be saying conflicting issues to the staff when it comes to the instructions they’re offering to the workers. That may create quite a lot of confusion amongst staff members, as they’re unclear on whose voice to hearken to probably the most, as they’re each co-CEOs. And worse, it makes it seem like the co-CEOs will not be in alignment and will not be speaking effectively with one another, which makes the staff nervous that management on the high would not know what they’re doing.
Lack of a tie-breaker
What occurs when the 2 co-CEOs can not agree on a subject? There isn’t a one there to interrupt the tie. Which both creates a degree of paralysis the place no determination will get made and the work would not get carried out in any respect. Or, it requires one of many co-CEOs to again down and comply with the opposite CEO (normally with the louder voice and character successful). And that may create resentment in direction of the opposite one that is continually not getting their opinions listened to or acted upon.
Associated: The Execs and Cons of the Co-CEO Mannequin
Totally different administration kinds may trigger friction
No two persons are precisely the identical; what occurs when there are philosophical-level variations in administration method? For example one of many co-CEOs is a “top-down” strategic degree thinker who likes to “see the large image forest,” and the opposite co-CEO is a “bottom-up” execution degree thinker who likes to “stay within the bushes.”
These two kinds are fully other ways to make selections and might simply “ruffle the feathers” of the 2 co-CEOs over time, forcing them to suppose and act in methods that aren’t their choice.
You lose management of half of the enterprise
In case you are the “Gross sales & Advertising and marketing” main co-CEO, that does not imply you do not have opinions on how “Expertise & Operations” is being run by the opposite co-CEO. However by dividing up the obligations, you might be mainly handing off all selections in these different departments to the opposite co-CEO. In case you belief the opposite particular person to function alone of their silo, that’s fantastic.
However what occurs when you may have a basic disagreement on how these different departments are being operated? You’ll be able to talk that to your co-CEO to try to repair it, however it’s in the end as much as them to make the specified modifications you need, which they could or might not do.
Your co-CEO refuses to remain “of their swim lane”
Although you might have divided up the administration obligations together with your co-CEO, that does not imply they are going to all the time keep of their “swim lane.” CEOs who like to guide and management usually have a extremely exhausting time giving up management to anybody else.
And when that “likes to manage” co-CEO, begins drifting into the “swim lane” of their different co-CEO, having to have enter on each determination of their departments, that may actually piss off the co-CEO. At that time, you do not actually have a co-CEO construction in any respect, with one particular person needing to manage all selections. That may find yourself very badly.
Associated: 4 Issues Profitable Leaders Know About Their Enterprise
Limits your exit choices
When it comes time to promote your small business, the brand new purchaser would like to have one CEO be their sole determination maker, who sits on their board and works with the traders. Additionally, when you’re able to promote, your co-CEO is probably not able to promote.
Now, you might be caught proudly owning and dealing in a enterprise that you simply not need to be working in. Or worse, you miss “your open window” to promote, and market situations change by the point your co-CEO is lastly able to promote, however now the window has closed, and you may’t promote.
You by no means need to be in a state of affairs when you may’t get an exit on your fairness, handcuffed by a co-CEO’s opinion, while you see an exit as the appropriate path ahead.
Closing ideas
Hopefully, you now have a greater understanding of the challenges at hand when you’re contemplating a co-CEO setup for your small business. There are examples the place co-CEOs have labored collectively completely — consider the Google founders (Sergey Brin and Larry Web page).
However most of the time, it finally ends up not figuring out very effectively in any respect — suppose the Salesforce executives (Marc Benioff first with Keith Block after which with Bret Taylor). So, in case you are contemplating this co-CEO path, purchaser beware, as it’s ripe with potential pitfalls and almost definitely won’t find yourself working effectively for the co-CEOs, the workers or your traders.
Oftentimes, two co-founders suppose it’s a good suggestion to share CEO obligations as co-CEOs. The logic is that they will separate their roles and obligations, with one particular person main sure departments (e.g., gross sales and advertising and marketing) and the opposite particular person main different departments (e.g., know-how and operations). The truth is, it is a fairly dangerous thought.
The enterprise ought to solely have one chief at a time who can “lead the ship” and ensure the whole lot is completely coordinated throughout the complete firm. This text will train you the potential pitfalls of a co-CEO technique.
Associated: 6 Methods to Efficiently Run Your Firm With a Co-President
The remainder of this text is locked.
Be part of Entrepreneur+ right now for entry.
