Digicam inner RAW recording for video — is it simply hype, or one thing you’ve embraced and integrated into your workflow? That is the query we’re asking in right this moment’s CineD ballot.
The controversy in regards to the significance of inner RAW recording for filmmakers has began to take an fascinating form, particularly after Blackmagic Design launched this selection with their Pocket Cinema Digicam (2013, cinemaDNG format). To the perfect of our data, it was one of many first video devoted mirrorless cameras to supply this characteristic, which, till then, was solely out there in higher-end units or when utilizing exterior recorders by way of HDMI. Since then, alongside Blackmagic Design, firms like Panasonic, SIGMA, Canon, Nikon, and RED, after all, have acknowledged the significance of giving impartial filmmakers most flexibility when selecting inner recording codecs, additionally in cost-effective digicam our bodies.
Now, for some, inner RAW video recording would possibly really feel like “overkill,” whereas for others it may be a manufacturing “life saver.” Talking of which, the place do you end up on this subject?
For me, particularly after working with latest cameras just like the Canon EOS C50 and Nikon ZR, I’m now fully satisfied that inner RAW video recording needs to be supplied by each digicam producer. Right here’s why: with out getting “too technical,” take into consideration inner RAW recording as a “security internet.” Certainly, all of us attempt to expose our video correctly and set the proper white steadiness, however as an impartial filmmaker who additionally edits his personal materials, inner RAW recording permits a lot higher flexibility in manipulating or treating the footage to realize satisfying outcomes with out sacrificing picture high quality.
In different phrases, the significance of inner RAW video recording is bigger in “lower-end” productions—the place one would possibly discover themselves doing all of it (or working with a restricted crew)—than in higher-end productions, the place devoted personnel might be assigned to particular duties like shade grading in massive post-production homes.
And sure, I’m totally conscious that the draw back of utilizing inner RAW codecs when filming is elevated card capability necessities (and at instances beefed-up computer systems), however I need to imagine that the funding and further expense are definitely worth the final result of utilizing such codecs on your workflow.
So, what about you? Do you assume inner RAW recording is simply hype and a advertising device, or a genuinely helpful characteristic when capturing your productions? Please take a second to take part in our ballot, and when you have time, go away a remark too!
This ballot makes use of JavaScript. For those who can’t see the ballot above, please disable “Enhanced/Strict Monitoring Safety” in your browser settings.
