A brand new AI coding problem has revealed its first winner — and set a brand new bar for AI-powered software program engineers.
On Wednesday at 5pm PST, the nonprofit Laude Institute introduced the primary winner of the Okay Prize, a multi-round AI coding problem launched by Databricks and Perplexity co-founder Andy Konwinski. The winner was a Brazilian immediate engineer named Eduardo Rocha de Andrade, who will obtain $50,000 for the prize. However extra stunning than the win was his ultimate rating: he gained with appropriate solutions to only 7.5% of the questions on the take a look at.
“We’re glad we constructed a benchmark that’s truly onerous,” mentioned Konwinski. “Benchmarks ought to be onerous in the event that they’re going to matter,” he continued, including: “Scores could be totally different if the massive labs had entered with their greatest fashions. However that’s form of the purpose. Okay Prize runs offline with restricted compute, so it favors smaller and open fashions. I really like that. It ranges the taking part in area.”
Konwinski has pledged $1 million to the primary open-source mannequin that may rating increased than 90% on the take a look at.
Just like the well-known SWE-Bench system, the Okay Prize exams fashions towards flagged points from GitHub as a take a look at of how properly fashions can take care of real-world programming issues. However whereas SWE-Bench is predicated on a hard and fast set of issues that fashions can practice towards, the Okay Prize is designed as a “contamination-free model of SWE-Bench,” utilizing a timed entry system to protect towards any benchmark-specific coaching. For spherical one, fashions had been due by March twelfth. The Okay Prize organizers then constructed the take a look at utilizing solely GitHub points flagged after that date.
The 7.5% high rating stands in marked distinction to SWE-Bench itself, which presently reveals a 75% high rating on its simpler ‘Verified’ take a look at and 34% on its tougher ‘Full’ take a look at. Konwinski nonetheless isn’t certain whether or not the disparity is because of contamination on SWE-Bench or simply the problem of gathering new points from GitHub, however he expects the Okay Prize mission to reply the query quickly.
“As we get extra runs of the factor, we’ll have a greater sense,” he advised TechCrunch, “as a result of we count on individuals to adapt to the dynamics of competing on this each few months.”
Techcrunch occasion
San Francisco
|
October 27-29, 2025
It would look like an odd place to fall quick, given the big selection of AI coding instruments already publicly obtainable – however with benchmarks changing into too straightforward, many critics see initiatives just like the Okay Prize as a vital step towards fixing AI’s rising analysis downside.
“I’m fairly bullish about constructing new exams for current benchmarks,” says Princeton researcher Sayash Kapoor, who put ahead an identical concept in a latest paper. “With out such experiments, we are able to’t truly inform if the difficulty is contamination, and even simply focusing on the SWE-Bench leaderboard with a human within the loop.”
For Konwinski, it’s not only a higher benchmark, however an open problem to the remainder of the business. “In case you hearken to the hype, it’s like we ought to be seeing AI docs and AI attorneys and AI software program engineers, and that’s simply not true,” he says. “If we are able to’t even get greater than 10% on a contamination free SWE-Bench, that’s the fact test for me.”
