The Core Internet Vitals Expertise Report by the open supply HTTPArchive neighborhood ranks content material administration methods by how nicely they carry out on Google’s Core Internet Vitals (CWV). The July replace exhibits that each main platform has improved since June, however not all positive aspects have been equal. Joomla posted the most important month-over-month improve, whereas Duda ranked first in July with 84.96% of websites passing CWV.
Why Core Internet Vitals Matter
Core Internet Vitals (CWV) are metrics created by Google to measure how briskly, steady, and responsive a web site feels to customers. Web sites that load rapidly and reply easily hold guests engaged, whereas websites that fall quick frustrate customers and improve bounce charges. For companies and publishers, CWV scores replicate the consumer expertise and competitiveness on-line.
How the Knowledge Is Collected
The CWV Expertise Report combines two public datasets:
- Chrome UX Report (CrUX): Knowledge from Chrome customers who choose in to share efficiency statistics as they browse. This displays how actual customers expertise web sites.
- HTTP Archive: Lab-based exams that analyze how websites are constructed and whether or not they observe efficiency greatest practices.
Collectively, these sources present a constant image of how totally different web site platforms carry out on Core Internet Vitals in the true world.
Share Change from June to July
#1 Joomla — largest achieve (+3.23%).
#2 Wix — +2.61%.
#3 Drupal — +1.47%.
#4 Duda — +1.33%.
#5 Squarespace — +1.27%.
#6 WordPress — smallest achieve (+0.90%).
This rating exhibits which platforms superior most in July. Joomla skilled the very best degree of development, whereas WordPress improved the least. Wix’s CWV month over month efficiency enchancment was a notable 2.51%.
Rating by July CWV Rating
Duda as soon as once more is the Core Internet Vitals champion, ranked by the share of internet sites that has a great CWV rating.
#1 Duda — 84.96%
#2 Wix — 73.37%
#3 Squarespace — 68.93%
#4 Drupal — 60.54%
#5 Joomla — 54.78%
#6 WordPress — 44.34%
Joomla confirmed the quickest development, but it surely nonetheless ranked fifth in July. Duda led with the very best general efficiency.
Why the Numbers Matter
Core Internet Vitals scores translate into actual variations in how customers expertise web sites. Platforms with larger CWV scores supply quicker, smoother interactions, whereas these on the backside frustrate customers with slower efficiency. Whereas all six platforms within the comparability are bettering month to month, what issues most is the precise expertise customers get proper now.
- Duda is the Core Internet Vitals champion in July with a rating of 84.96% of internet sites constructed with the Duda platform having a great CWV rating.
- Joomla had the most important achieve, however nonetheless ranked close to the underside with solely 54.78% of websites exhibiting a great CWV rating.
- Wix and Squarespace ranked within the second and third locations, exhibiting robust efficiency however each considerably behind Duda by over ten proportion factors.
- WordPress ranked final, each in July scores and within the month over month charge of enchancment.
Do Content material Administration Methods Matter For Rating?
I’ve seen discussions on-line about whether or not the selection of content material administration system has an influence on rankings. Some individuals assert that plugins make WordPress simpler to rank in Google.
There’s additionally a notion that WordPress is quicker than Wix, Duda, and Squarespace. The information, after all, present that the alternative is true. WordPress is the slowest of the content material administration methods on this comparability.
The proportion of websites constructed with Duda that had a great Core Internet Vitals rating is 84.96%. The proportion of WordPress websites with a great CWV rating is 44.34%. Which means Duda’s proportion of websites with good CWV scores is about 92% larger than these constructed with WordPress.
One other challenge with WordPress is that it has a substantial quantity of technical debt, one thing that personal content material administration methods would not have to wrestle with to the identical diploma. Technical debt refers back to the accumulation of outdated code and design selections that make it more durable to keep up, replace, or enhance the platform over time. It isn’t distinctive to WordPress, but it surely is a matter due to how WordPress is constructed and the way its ecosystem works.
Some causes for WordPress’s technical debt:
- WordPress was initially conceived as a running a blog platform and has advanced right into a full CMS, capable of be prolonged as nearly any form of web site.
- Including new options on prime of legacy code means workarounds should be made for backward compatibility, which creates complexity and slows down innovation.
Technical debt was a difficulty mentioned at WordCamp EU 2025, summarized on the official WordPress website as associated to contributor burnout:
“Burnout Disaster & Sustainability
- Contributor burnout is pervasive as a consequence of:
- Excessive volunteer calls for with inadequate systemic help.
- Lack of equitable monetary remuneration or stipends for ongoing work.
- Strain to keep up legacy methods and innovate new options results in overwhelming workloads.
Penalties
- Lack of institutional information and skilled contributors.
- Rising technical debt and slowed innovation cycles.
- Menace to WordPress’s long-term ecosystem well being.”
WordPress has lately moved to a slower annual launch cycle, and one of many advantages of that change (summarized by WordPress right here) is that it provides the undertaking time to handle the difficulty of technical debt.
The purpose is that if the content material administration system did affect the flexibility to rank, WordPress websites would in all probability wrestle to rank due to the comparatively poor efficiency scores and the slower tempo of growth when in comparison with non-public content material administration methods like Wix. However that’s not the case.
WordPress web sites rank very nicely regardless of all the problems with the platform, together with safety. So it might be that the selection of CMS doesn’t essentially matter for website positioning, particularly since non-public options like Wix and Duda are purposely constructed with website positioning in thoughts. Nonetheless, efficiency is necessary for issues that matter, resembling conversions and the consumer expertise, and the actual fact is that the HTTPArchive Expertise Comparability Report ranks WordPress final for Core Internet Vitals efficiency in July.
Featured Picture by Shutterstock/Roman Samborskyi
