Chief of Epping Forest council requires calm after courtroom of attraction ruling
The chief of Epping Forest district council has known as for calm after the courtroom of attraction dominated asylum seekers can keep on the Bell lodge in Essex.
Councillor Chris Whitbread instructed Occasions Radio:
I name for calm. There’s been peaceable protests and there’s been non peaceable protests exterior the lodge.
He added:
We noticed yesterday the federal government say that asylum seekers have extra rights than my residents. I’m actually cross with this ruling. Clearly we’ll now replicate on the place we’re.
Clearly we’re nonetheless going to courtroom in October to go for a closing injunction and we might be pushing onerous to guarantee that’s profitable, however we are going to do every part we are able to nonetheless.
That is an terrible place for the city … I’m actually involved for the way forward for the city in the intervening time.
Councillor Ken Williamson from Epping Forest district council speaks to the media exterior the excessive courtroom in London after Friday’s ruling. {Photograph}: Andy Rain/EPA
Talking exterior the London courtroom after the ruling, Ken Williamson, member of cupboard for Epping Forest district council stated:
We perceive authorities faces a dilemma, however that shouldn’t be on the expense of native communities.
Planning legislation could appear uninteresting, it may appear boring, nevertheless it goes to the center of the connection between native communities and good authorities. It enshrines the rights of native folks to have a say inside their very own communities, and it shouldn’t be put aside evenly. The federal government can nonetheless pay attention.
It wants to grasp and take accountability for the occasions which have taken place in Epping over the previous six weeks, for the trauma and disruption introduced upon our neighborhood.
The council may nonetheless be granted an injunction after a full listening to of the authorized declare, which is because of be heard in October.
Share
Up to date at 10.50 EDT
Key occasions
Present key occasions solely
Please activate JavaScript to make use of this characteristic
The chief of Epping Forest District Council in Essex has questioned whether or not Bell Lodge homeowners Somani Lodges “chased” its planning software.
In a abstract of their ruling, Lord Justice Bean, Woman Justice Nicola Davies and Lord Justice Cobb highlighted that in February 2023 Somani had sought planning permission from the council to briefly change the lodge’s use to accommodate asylum seekers fairly than paying members of the general public, however that the council “didn’t course of the appliance” for greater than a yr.
Requested why the appliance had taken so lengthy to course of, councillor Christopher Whitbread stated he was “not shut sufficient to the element” to present a “full reply”.
He added: “I feel, you understand, it’s important to ask your self ‘was the corporate chasing the planning software throughout that point?’
“In my data of planning purposes, in the event that they’ve been delayed, that the corporate going for the planning software might be chasing the council.
“Did they chase the council? We don’t know.”
Share
The federal government has “let the residents of Epping down”, the chief of Epping Forest District Council stated.
Requested what his message can be to individuals who could also be planning to protest this weekend within the Essex city, Councillor Christopher Whitbread instructed the PA information company: “We don’t need to see some violent scenes across the lodge or within the city itself that may that may solely assist the Authorities’s arguments, and it’s the Authorities which have let the residents of Epping down.
“I had quite a few conversations with varied folks round this subject, the House Workplace weren’t useful.”
He stated housing asylum seekers on the Bell Lodge was “not proper” for residents of Epping or these residing within the lodge itself, including: “We made that argument to the earlier authorities and ultimately they closed it.
“This Authorities reopened it in April with no actual session with us, they instructed us that they have been going to make use of it.
“We have been instructed on the numbers and such that they have been ready to make use of it as much as, and actually they’ve let down fully the residents of Epping Forest, and I feel what underlined it was their authorized argument yesterday across the ECHR and the truth that the asylum seekers trump the residents of Epping relating to their rights.”
Share
In response to at this time’s verdict, Weyman Bennett, Stand As much as Racism co-convenor stated: “The preliminary judgement was at all times fallacious. It was a concession to racist thugs set on scapegoating and intimidating refugees.”
Kevin Courtney, Stand Up To Racism co-chair, stated: “This courtroom judgement is welcome, hateful demonstrations shouldn’t decide public coverage.
“The far proper will search to make use of it to stimulate increasingly more hostile demonstrations concentrating on asylum seeker in motels. It’s necessary that every one folks of goodwill communicate out and peacefully mobilise towards this hateful concentrating on of weak folks.”
Share
Protesters have begun to collect exterior the Bell Lodge in Epping after the Courtroom of Enchantment ruling.
A small variety of demonstrators carrying England and Union flags have gathered exterior the lodge, with cops guarding its entrance – which is gated off with steel fencing.
An England flag has been hooked up to a drain pipe on the facet of the Bell Lodge and England flags have additionally been painted onto indicators and a pace digicam exterior the lodge.
Law enforcement officials watch protesters exterior the Bell Lodge after a short lived injunction that may have blocked asylum seekers from being housed on the lodge in Epping, Essex, was overturned on the Courtroom of Enchantment. {Photograph}: Lucy North/PAShare
Kevin Rawlinson
Three attraction judges on Friday put aside a short lived injunction granted to Epping Forest district council final week, saying the choice to permit it was “critically flawed” and contained a number of “errors in precept”.
The lodge has in current weeks turn out to be the main target of repeated protests – a few of which have been orchestrated by far-right extremists and have turned violent. Epping council had supplied this as a part of its grounds for searching for the injunction – alongside considerations about planning permission for the lodge.
Final week, Mr Justice Eyre, sitting within the excessive courtroom, agreed. However, on Friday, the courtroom of attraction judges stated upholding that order may result in additional dysfunction by successfully demonstrating it may obtain its final objective – the elimination of the asylum seekers a method or one other.
They stated the folks residing on the Bell lodge must be housed someplace, whereas different councils may take preserving the injunction as a inexperienced gentle to hunt the identical of their areas.
Share
In a abstract of their ruling, Lord Justice Bean, Woman Justice Nicola Davies and Lord Justice Cobb stated that Somani Lodges, which owns the Bell lodge, was first made conscious of authorized motion being taken by Epping Forest district council when it “obtained the courtroom papers and a courtroom bundle working to over 1,600 pages”.
The judges stated the authority’s “ways” have been “procedurally unfair” and “must have bolstered the argument” {that a} short-term injunction shouldn’t have been issued.
They stated:
For a lot of the interval of 4 years from 2020-2024, Somani [Hotels] had been working the lodge as lodging for asylum seekers with out enforcement motion from the council.
When, in 2023, Somani [Hotels] sought planning consent to alter its use, for over a yr, Epping didn’t course of the appliance, however the statutory obligation upon it to take action inside eight weeks.
The council was conscious by February 2025 that the lodge was as soon as once more for use to accommodate asylum seekers and by its letter of 15 Could 2025, Somani [Hotels] made clear that it had been suggested by the House Workplace {that a} planning software was pointless.
The council took no steps in response to this letter, whether or not by issuing an enforcement discover or in any other case. There was no risk of courtroom proceedings.
Share
Epping Forest district council will “proceed to combat” the federal government after the courtroom of attraction ruling, a councillor has stated.
Holly Whitbread stated the ruling was “deeply disappointing”, including she felt “totally let down and betrayed by the federal government”. Whitbread, who’s finance and financial improvement portfolio holder for Epping Forest district council, instructed the PA information company:
The council will proceed to combat this
We’re taking a look at our authorized choices now and we might be going forward, I presume, with the everlasting injunction within the October trial, if that’s nonetheless attainable.
The Conservative councillor added:
The council has at all times been towards using this lodge on this location.
One of many key factors that wasn’t made clear within the courtroom case was the change to all-male asylum seekers inside the lodge.
I’m fairly livid on the authorities’s motion to intervene in what was a authorized planning matter. And I feel this information might be deeply disappointing to the residents of Epping Forest and, extra broadly, throughout the UK as nicely.
Share
In a abstract of their ruling overturning the injunction associated to the Bell lodge, Lord Justice Bean, Woman Justice Nicola Davies and Lord Justice Cobb stated an argument put ahead by the House Workplace within the attraction a few “hierarchy of rights” was “unattractive”.
The House Workplace had instructed the courtroom of attraction in written submissions for Thursday’s listening to that whereas Epping Forest district council represented “the general public curiosity that subsists in planning management in its native space”, the division represented the “public curiosity of the whole thing of the UK”.
Barristers for the federal government instructed the courtroom that the European conference on human rights “establishes non-derogable basic human rights”, including:
The respective authorized rights in play are basically completely different in nature.
In a abstract of their ruling, the three courtroom of attraction judges stated:
The written arguments on behalf of [the Home Office] on this attraction included the competition that ‘the related public pursuits in play will not be equal’ and that one facet of that is that the house secretary’s statutory obligation is a manifestation of the UK’s obligations beneath article 3 of the European conference on human rights. This level was not pursued in oral argument.
Any argument on this specific context a few hierarchy of rights is in our view unattractive.
The abstract continued:
We have been instructed by counsel for Epping [Forest district council] that the protests operated as a ‘set off’ for the appliance for the injunction. The actual fact of protests exterior a constructing shouldn’t be clearly a matter falling inside planning management.
Whereas we settle for that the choose was proper to train appreciable warning earlier than attaching weight to the actual fact of the protests, together with illegal protests exterior the lodge, he nonetheless gave weight in his analysis to the truth that protests have been occurring and weighed them within the steadiness as a think about favour of granting the injunction.
These are worrying facets of the judgment.
If an outbreak of protests enhances the case for a planning injunction, this runs the chance of performing as an impetus or incentive for additional protests, a few of which can be disorderly, round asylum lodging.
At its worst, if even illegal protests are to be handled as related, there’s a threat of encouraging additional lawlessness. The choose doesn’t seem to have thought of this threat, once more maybe as a result of he had denied himself the benefit of listening to submissions on the deserves from counsel for the [Home Office].
Additional and in any occasion, on this regard the choose failed to contemplate whether or not there would have been different measures to mitigate the disruption, akin to using police powers.
Share
Nigel Farage claimed the European conference on human rights had been “used” by the federal government “towards the folks of Epping”, although the choose dominated that arguments a few “hierarchy of rights” have been “unattractive”.
The Reform UK chief stated:
The federal government has used ECHR towards the folks of Epping. Unlawful migrants have extra rights than the British folks beneath Starmer.
He didn’t specify which a part of the case he was referring to.
The House Workplace’s attorneys had argued “the related public pursuits in play will not be equal”, referring to Epping’s curiosity in implementing planning management on the one hand, and the house secretary’s obligation which comes from UK obligations beneath the ECHR on the opposite.
Nonetheless, Friday’s ruling says:
Any argument on this specific context a few hierarchy of rights is in our view unattractive.
For extra on this subject, learn BBC Information dwelling and authorized correspondent Dominic Casciani’s tackle the ruling (see 3.29pm BST).
Share
Chief of Epping Forest council requires calm after courtroom of attraction ruling
The chief of Epping Forest district council has known as for calm after the courtroom of attraction dominated asylum seekers can keep on the Bell lodge in Essex.
Councillor Chris Whitbread instructed Occasions Radio:
I name for calm. There’s been peaceable protests and there’s been non peaceable protests exterior the lodge.
He added:
We noticed yesterday the federal government say that asylum seekers have extra rights than my residents. I’m actually cross with this ruling. Clearly we’ll now replicate on the place we’re.
Clearly we’re nonetheless going to courtroom in October to go for a closing injunction and we might be pushing onerous to guarantee that’s profitable, however we are going to do every part we are able to nonetheless.
That is an terrible place for the city … I’m actually involved for the way forward for the city in the intervening time.
Councillor Ken Williamson from Epping Forest district council speaks to the media exterior the excessive courtroom in London after Friday’s ruling. {Photograph}: Andy Rain/EPA
Talking exterior the London courtroom after the ruling, Ken Williamson, member of cupboard for Epping Forest district council stated:
We perceive authorities faces a dilemma, however that shouldn’t be on the expense of native communities.
Planning legislation could appear uninteresting, it may appear boring, nevertheless it goes to the center of the connection between native communities and good authorities. It enshrines the rights of native folks to have a say inside their very own communities, and it shouldn’t be put aside evenly. The federal government can nonetheless pay attention.
It wants to grasp and take accountability for the occasions which have taken place in Epping over the previous six weeks, for the trauma and disruption introduced upon our neighborhood.
The council may nonetheless be granted an injunction after a full listening to of the authorized declare, which is because of be heard in October.
Share
Up to date at 10.50 EDT
Reacting to the overturning of the injunction, Refugee Council chief govt Enver Solomon stated whereas the federal government was profitable in its attraction, the fact of utilizing motels to accommodate asylum seekers is “untenable”. He stated:
Ready till 2029 to finish their use is not an choice.
So long as motels stay open, they’ll proceed to be flashpoints for protests, fuelling division and leaving individuals who have fled struggle and persecution feeling unsafe.
By our frontline work we see how refugees housed in neighbourhoods, fairly than remoted in motels, are in a position to rebuild their lives, enter coaching or work, and contribute to the native economic system.
The refugee charity urged ministers to undertake a “one off” scheme granting short-term permission to remain to asylum seekers from international locations most probably to be recognised as refugees as a technique to shut motels by subsequent yr, in keeping with its personal evaluation.
Share
Talking on BBC Information, the broadcaster’s dwelling and authorized correspondent, Dominic Casciani, stated from exterior the Royal Courts of Justice after the judgment:
To make use of an analogy from sport, it felt like a wrestling smackdown for the choose who gave this injunction to the council.
That is fairly a technical factor as a result of in essence the decrease courtroom, the excessive courtroom, the choose there had the discretion to say: ‘Look, I’ve checked out all of the information and utilizing my discretion, which is why I feel an injunction is important as a result of the information on the bottom are such that we’ve acquired a very regarding scenario. We’ve acquired to comprise what’s occurring there, subsequently I feel it’s in one of the best curiosity to maneuver the asylum seekers out in the interim earlier than Epping Forest district council will get to mount its full case towards the lodge proprietor, which can then finally determine the problem a method or one other.’
What the courtroom of attraction stated at this time was: ‘No, you bought that completley fallacious. And the rationale you bought that fully fallacious is since you didn’t bear in mind that there are compelling arguments that the house secretary needs to be allowed to make, as a result of she is beneath a authorized obligation, imposed by parliament.’
[And] that is the necessary factor, it’s imposed by parliament, it’s acquired nothing to do with the European courtroom of human rights or all that stuff you would possibly learn elsewhere, this can be a obligation imposed by parliament to guarantee that asylum seekers aren’t sleeping on the streets. So, on daily basis that the house secretary shouldn’t be discovering someplace to place someone in a mattress, she’s going through potential authorized motion over that failure to take action. And what the courtroom of attraction stated was that the choose who issued the injuction ought to have taken all of this in to account earlier than issuing his orders to clear the lodge, as a result of how may he in any other case have understood the implications for nationwide coverage and successfully what is named the broader public curiosity.
… the power of the argument from the courtroom of attraction … in essence, the sensible results of which might be that I feel this makes it exceptionally onerous for every other council to try to do what Epping Forest [council] have accomplished.
Share
Authorities reiterats that every one asylum motels will shut by the following election, in assertion after courtroom of attraction ruling
The House Workplace has issued a ministerial assertion concerning at this time’s courtroom of attraction judgment on using the Bell lodge. Angela Eagle, minister for border safety and asylum stated:
We inherited a chaotic asylum lodging system costing billions. This authorities will shut all motels by the top of this parliament and we appealed this judgment so motels just like the Bell might be exited in a managed and orderly method that avoids the chaos of current years that noticed 400 motels open at a price of £9m a day.
The variety of motels has virtually halved since its peak in 2023 and we now have introduced down prices by 15% saving £700m and placing us on monitor to avoid wasting a billion kilos a yr by 2028-29.
We’re additionally working onerous to alleviate strain on the system and hanging again at legal folks smuggling gangs at each stage, together with returning greater than 35,000 individuals who don’t have any proper to be right here, equipping legislation enforcement with counter-terror fashion powers and beginning to detain small boat arrivals beneath our groundbreaking cope with France.
It’s going to take a while to repair the damaged system we inherited, however the British public deserve nothing much less, and we is not going to cease till the job is finished.
Share
Up to date at 10.33 EDT
Senior Tory Robert Jenrick known as the courtroom of attraction ruling “extraordinarily disappointing” and urged councils to nonetheless take motion to shut asylum motels of their areas.
Shadow justice secretary Jenrick posted on X:
That is an especially disappointing determination. Yvette Cooper used taxpayer cash – your cash – to maintain open a lodge housing unlawful migrants.
The federal government’s attorneys argued accommodating unlawful migrants was within the ‘nationwide curiosity’. In courtroom they stated the fitting of unlawful migrants to free motels is extra necessary than the rights of the British folks.
Nicely, they aren’t. The British authorities ought to at all times put the pursuits of the British folks first. Starmer’s authorities has proven itself to be on the facet of unlawful migrants who’ve damaged into our county. However this isn’t a free go for asylum motels.
Councils can and will nonetheless act to shut motels. In the event that they don’t, residents will rightly ask, on whose facet are they? My workforce and LawForBorders will proceed to supply authorized help to assist shield communities.
There is no such thing as a acceptable lodging for unlawful migrants. The federal government must be prioritising Brits in want and deporting each unlawful migrant, because the final authorities ought to have accomplished and I’ve argued for years.
Senior Conservative James Cleverly steered that the House Workplace was chopping native folks out of the loop. The shadow native authorities secretary stated:
I’m certain that Yvette Cooper and the House Workplace officers assume that is excellent news. It actually isn’t. Slicing native folks and their elected representatives out of the loop isn’t a very good look.
Share
